Motorists dread the situation wherein their penalty points 'totted up' which can lead to driving ban. The legal courts can issue a driving ban for those having two to four consecutive offences, depending on the gravity of the situation.
A total of 12 or more penalty points will strike you a meeting with the authorities that will review your case and recommend probation of up to 6 months.
This law might increase the amount depending on the discretion of the judge as they see fit. The period by which the penalty depends is determined by the past penalties of the offender. For example, anyone with 2 disqualifications in the past 3 years will have a longer driving ban than those who are first time offenders.
Legal courts are usually inclined to give you a driving ban, unless you prove them wrong. Occasionally, this can be done with a rather forceful persuasion.
Thus, how do you bring about a successful argument?
One good example that most people would use is the immediate effect on one's health when his license has been taken away. It is by no means limited to oneself as the argument can expand to include anyone under your care that might suffer due to the ban.
Gaining ground after an argument doesn't mean you're off the hook. You will not be able to use the same argument again and in such case of reoccurrence, you definitely need some expert legal advice.
Some point taken by courts is the degree by which the hardship is affected. It is not enough to say that you cannot go to work with a driving ban but it must be elevated to the point of 'exceptional hardship'. Taken literally, this is subject to a lot of interpretation. Lack of employment might not suffice to convince a judge to reverse the penalty but if it is taken into the context of people surrounding you, then the hardship argument can persist.
Here are a few valid arguments that can be used.
1. Contrive ambulation because of severe health conditions.
2. Quick employment and financial loss as a result of the ban.
3. Problems attained by others due to your restrictions.
4. Public safety is at risk (such as firemen)
Presenting your arguments credibly, you are require to:
1. Present evidence that correlates with your arguments.
2. A legitimate case where hardship is obvious
3. A great set of facts that presents your case without any reasonable doubt.
Now the question that I'm pretty sure that lingers from everyone reading this is...Do I need a road traffic lawyer for this?
Figures shows that there is a great discrepancy among success rate on those who got a good lawyer and those who chose to present it by themselves. Look for the services of a road traffic lawyer in Glasgow if your license is important to you.
A total of 12 or more penalty points will strike you a meeting with the authorities that will review your case and recommend probation of up to 6 months.
This law might increase the amount depending on the discretion of the judge as they see fit. The period by which the penalty depends is determined by the past penalties of the offender. For example, anyone with 2 disqualifications in the past 3 years will have a longer driving ban than those who are first time offenders.
Legal courts are usually inclined to give you a driving ban, unless you prove them wrong. Occasionally, this can be done with a rather forceful persuasion.
Thus, how do you bring about a successful argument?
One good example that most people would use is the immediate effect on one's health when his license has been taken away. It is by no means limited to oneself as the argument can expand to include anyone under your care that might suffer due to the ban.
Gaining ground after an argument doesn't mean you're off the hook. You will not be able to use the same argument again and in such case of reoccurrence, you definitely need some expert legal advice.
Some point taken by courts is the degree by which the hardship is affected. It is not enough to say that you cannot go to work with a driving ban but it must be elevated to the point of 'exceptional hardship'. Taken literally, this is subject to a lot of interpretation. Lack of employment might not suffice to convince a judge to reverse the penalty but if it is taken into the context of people surrounding you, then the hardship argument can persist.
Here are a few valid arguments that can be used.
1. Contrive ambulation because of severe health conditions.
2. Quick employment and financial loss as a result of the ban.
3. Problems attained by others due to your restrictions.
4. Public safety is at risk (such as firemen)
Presenting your arguments credibly, you are require to:
1. Present evidence that correlates with your arguments.
2. A legitimate case where hardship is obvious
3. A great set of facts that presents your case without any reasonable doubt.
Now the question that I'm pretty sure that lingers from everyone reading this is...Do I need a road traffic lawyer for this?
Figures shows that there is a great discrepancy among success rate on those who got a good lawyer and those who chose to present it by themselves. Look for the services of a road traffic lawyer in Glasgow if your license is important to you.
About the Author:
Looking to find the best deal on Road traffic lawyer Glasgow, then visit www.keepmylicence.com to find the best advice on Dangerous driving Scotland for you.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar